Menu
Menu
The purpose of the Southern Weed Contest is to provide an educational experience from which undergraduate and graduate students in Southern Universities can broaden their applied skills in Weed Science. The contest provides an opportunity for Weed Science students be exposed to weed scientists from other universities and industry, apply what they have learned using a contest to measure their capabilities, as well as to socialize. It is hopeful that the contest will increase the visibility of Weed Science and intensify the interest level of those participating in the discipline of Weed Science.
Any undergraduate or graduate student currently enrolled and pursuing a B.S., M.S., or Ph.D. degree is eligible to participate. Each graduate team will consist of three or four members, composed of (a) graduate, (b) undergraduate, or (c) a combination of graduate and undergraduate students. If a university does not have sufficient students for a team, up to two students may enter as individuals. All students will compete using the same contest material. A team may also bring two alternates. Alternate scores will only count toward individual awards. Team scores will be determined from averaging the individual scores from each team member; unless a three-person team is entered. Then the three highest individuals will be averaged. A maximum of two coaches per team can attend the contest. Students will be allowed to participate in the contest five times as a team member or alternate; however, the student can only participate as a team member three times. Undergraduate participation will not count against the five-time rule.
All teams must enter the contest by May 1, 2024. Names of team members and alternates must be provided by July 1, 2024 to contacts above.
TEAM – The highest average team score from all events will determine the overall contest winner. A traveling “Broken Hoe” trophy will be presented to the overall winner and will rotate yearly. The first place team will receive a check for $500 and each member and coach will receive an engraved plaque. The second and third place teams will receive checks of $300 and $200, respectively. Each will also receive an engraved plaque as described above.
INDIVIDUAL – The highest combined score from all events, except team sprayer calibration, will determine the overall-winning individual. The Top 5 awarded a plaque and the top 10 individuals will be recognized. The winning individual will receive a check for $400. Individuals finishing second, third, fourth, and fifth will receive checks from $250, $100, $75, and $50, respectively. The high individual in Weed Identification, Crop Response to Herbicides, Sprayer Calibration Problem Set, and Crop/Weed Situation and Recommendations will be recognized and awarded a plaque. If at least four undergraduate students participate in the contest, the top three individual scores will be recognized with first, second, and third place plaques and checks for $200, $100, and $50, respectively.
The contest will consist of four major events plus a mystery event. Inclement weather may delay the contest; however, it will continue as soon as conditions permit.
While contestants are briefed on contest details. Coaches will be taken to the contest site to review all aspects of the contest. Coaches will review the six phases of the contest: weed identification, herbicide identification, sprayer and written calibration, crop/weed situation and recommendations, and mystery event. The coaches will then be taken to a neutral site. No contact, electronic or otherwise, with contestants will be allowed until all events have been completed. A committee meeting will also be conducted, if needed, either the day before the contest or on the day of the contest.
From the contest weed identification list of 100 weeds and weed seeds/tubers, the host will pick a total of 50 weeds and/or weed seeds to be identified. Plants could either be grown in a field weed nursery or pots or presented in digital picture form (must be of good quality and clarity) and may be in any stage of growth or development within reason. A complete weed identification list is provided with the correct spelling of each species (Table 1). Students will be responsible for the correct common and scientific name and spelling (WSSA Composite List of Weeds). All answers must be printed (no cursive allowed) and must be legible to be awarded credit for correct answers. Undergraduate students will only use the common names. The fall preceding the contest the host should evaluate its weed seed supply and obtain additional seeds/tubers if needed so that an excellent representation of the weed species can be selected for identification. It is important to utilize as many plant species as possible. The plants will be grown in sufficient numbers so that adequate samples are available so that 30 to 70 contestants can have specimens for identification. The contestants will be allowed ample time to identify each specimen. The percentage of samples will range from 50 to 80% weeds and from 50 to 20% seeds. Uncontaminated samples are essential for effective identification. Pure samples are essential. The contestant’s score will be figured as follows: 2 points for each correctly identified species (1 point for common name and 1 point for scientific name with 0.5 points for genus and 0.5 points for species) x 50 = 100 points. If names are not spelled correctly or capitalized correctly, they are wrong. Likewise, answers must be in the correct column. Teams will not be supplied weed seed for study, but rather rely on their own training resources.
However, teams are encouraged to expand/improve their training resources through contacts with other weed scientists. This approach may better reflect individual and team preparation for the contest.
This event consists of two sections: an individual written test worth 50 points and a team sprayer calibration event worth 50 points.
The individual written test will cover problems and factual information about sprayer and seed treatment calibration of all types; the written portion will be scored as an individual and team event (50 points per person). The host should take particular care to insure all banded application and skip-row calibration problems are stated clearly. Individual team members and alternates will be given a maximum of 1 hour to complete the written exam. The host will provide calculators and students will not be allowed to use their own. The three or four individual team member scores will be added and divided by the number of individuals on the team to give the number of points out of 50 for the team score.
In the team section, the host will provide a hands-on calibration activity that focuses on team, rather than individual performance. Students should have practical calibration knowledge for air blast sprayers, tractor sprayers, backpack sprayers, granular applicators, greenhouse spray chambers, etc. Differences in time for the competition will count no more than 40% of the overall score. Accuracy of calibration is critical.
To determine final team score for the calibration event, the number of points scored out of 50 obtained in the team event will be added to the average score of the three or four high team members from the individual calibration problems for a maximum possible of 100 points.
Reference material includes various Weed Science textbooks, Herbicide Handbook, and various unit conversions.
This is an area of extreme difficulty for the students. Thus, the host must have available a sprinkler irrigation system so that residual herbicides may be activated and weeds and crops maintained in an active growth stage for postemergence treatments. A list of possible crops and herbicides with rate and method of application are provided in Table 2. The test must contain at least 6 crops and 6 weeds and will be planted and treated with a wide range of preemergence and postemergence herbicides from the list. Each herbicide plot will contain a 1X rate of the unknown herbicide. It is suggested that the test be planted 4 to 5 weeks prior to the contest, with postemergence herbicides being applied 10 to 14 days prior to the contest. Each contestant will be required to identify the unknown herbicides by the WSSA group number and common name by observation of crop and weed responses. Both names and group number will be given equal credit; in other words missing common name or group number will behalfright.
There should be from 10 to 15 plots. Herbicide plots may be duplicated and check plots can be utilized. It would be of great benefit to the students if they could be led back through the plots following the event. Students will not be allowed to pull any portion of the plants in the plots. If plants are pulled, the student will lose the points for that plot.
Contestants will be required within 15 minutes to determine and evaluate a crop/weed situation and recommend the most effective legal remedy to the problem. Each contestant will have two field problems to solve. Recommendations must comply with the label of each herbicide recommended. Students should give consideration to such factors as stage of growth, crop tolerance, climatological factors, agricultural spraying procedures, weed control, economics, and impact upon the environment. The host will determine the best answer considering all alternatives for a situation, although several possible answers may be correct. The latest Federal (Section 3) or State (Section 24C) labels of the product constitutes legal control. The event will be conducted as a “role-play” situation and the potential problem will be in one of the crops on the problem-solving sheet. Also, the crop/weed situation will involve only the listed herbicides and weeds on the predetermined problem-solving sheet. The contestant will be asked to assume the role of a chemical company representative, state extension specialist, or independent crop consultant when dealing with the farmer and scored as follows:
5 points – proper approach/greeting to farmer
20 points – understanding and solving problem
12.5 points – recommendations for this year’s crop
12.5 points – recommendations for next year’s crop
Each team will be divided at random into two groups in order to handle one of two different problem situations. Following completion of the first problem, the groups will switch problems and repeat the procedure. Each participant will evaluate the same two problems. Alternates and other individuals will be equally divided between the two groups. The assigned judge and farmer will independently score each participant from a predetermined scoring sheet with assigned points for each statement, compare scores, and adjust if necessary. Prior to the contest, judges and farmers will be tested to ensure that the scorers will give equivalent scores within each individual field problem. Each field problem will be worth 50 points and to obtain the participants score, the two scores will be added for a maximum of 100 points.
This team or individual event will be an agronomic related problem and the contestants will not be advised of the area to study prior to the contest. The mystery event will count toward the team score and individual scores.
Overall team ranking of each respective school should be provided to the team coach the night of the banquet following the event. Individual score sheets including their respective ranking against all other competitors should be distributed back to the contestants or their coach at the end of the banquet. An answer key should also be distributed to the team coach.
Scores should be tabulated using a scoring format as listed in the examples below. Each phase of the contest will be scored equally (100 pts. each) except for the mystery event (15 pts) for a total of 415 points per team.
Examples are:
A. All teams with four individuals.
Events
Field Problem Calibration
Super University | ID | Crop/Weed Response | 1 | 2 | Avg. | Team | Ind. | Myst. | Score | Ind. | Team Placing |
John Doe | 86 | 60 | 25 | 19 | 44 | — | 45 | 5 | 240 | 9 | |
Bill Smith | 80 | 65 | 47 | 31 | 78 | — | 35 | 5 | 263 | 5 | |
Jane Doe | 95 | 75 | 35 | 25 | 60 | — | 45 | 0 | 275 | 1 | |
Roy James | 63 | 50 | 43 | 43 | 86 | — | 45 | 3 | 247 | 7 | |
Total |
324.0 |
250.0 |
— |
— |
268 |
— |
170 |
13 | |||
Team Avg. Team Total | 81.0
296.25 | 62.5 | — | — | 67 | 40 | 42.5 | 3.25 |
3 | ||
Alternates | |||||||||||
Pat Ray | 80 | 60 | 31 | 201 | 51 | — | 45 | 5 | 241 | 8 | |
Jim Jones | 65 | 45 | 27 | 18 | 45 | — | 50 | 0 | 205 | 20 |
B. Mixed three and four individual teams (if teams with three individuals attend).
Events
Field Problem Calibration
Super University | ID | Crop/Weed Response | 1 | 2 | Avg. | Team | Ind. | Myst. | Score | Ind. | Team Placing |
John Doe | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 240 | 9 | |
Bill Smith | 80 | 65 | 47 | 31 | 78 | — | 35 | 5 | 263 | 5 | |
Jane Doe | 95 | 75 | 35 | 25 | 60 | — | 45 | 0 | 275 | 1 | |
Roy James | 63 | 50 | 43 | 43 | 86 | — | 45 | 3 | 247 | 7 | |
Total | 238.0 | 190.0 | — | — | 224 | — | 125 | 8 | |||
Team Avg.
Team Total | 79.33
301.67 | 63.33
| —
| —
| 74.6
| 40
| 41.67
| 2.67
|
3
| ||
Alternates | |||||||||||
Pat Ray | 80 | 60 | 31 | 20 | 51 | — | 45 | 5 | 241 | 8 | |
Jim Jones | 65 | 45 | 27 | 18 | 45 | — | 50 | 0 | 205 | 20 |
Alternates and low individuals of four member teams will not be scored as part of a team, but can win individual prizes.
All coaches and individuals within academia, research, and industry, as well as potential contest hosts are invited to serve on the committee. On the morning of the contest, prior to contestants entering the events, individuals from the host location and all committee members will review each event and last minute corrections will be made and be the authority for all questions relating to the contest. If questions arise that cannot be resolved through interpretation of the standing rules or cannot be resolved through communication with the committee chairman or members of the committee, the contest host has the authority to make the final decision in the best interest of the contest.
Each university will provide its own transportation to and from the contest and cover all expenses incurred during travel. The host will provide meals the evening before and the day of the contest. The weed contest committee will provide the prize money and the plaques.
The Southern Weed Contest will be held at any facility within the Southern Weed Science Region with the capability of providing all the designated events.
All coaches are charged with ensuring that teams abide by rules of the contest, and that no team gains an unfair advantage. This includes, but is not limited to, cheating. Cheating is defined as a dishonest violation of rules as determined by the coaches attending the contest. A committee made up of all coaches attending the contest will deal with acts related to cheating. A team and/or individual that does not abide by the rules of the contest will be disqualified and will automatically receive last place at the contest. Teams are not allowed to visit contest site 30 days prior to contest without permission of host. All contestants’ cell phones, iPad’s, or computers will be collected by team coaches and bagged by individual name when arriving at the contest site on the morning of the event.
Common name | Genus | Species | |
1 | velvetleaf | Abutilon | theophrasti |
2 | hophornbeam copperleaf | Acalypha | ostryifolia |
3 | tree-of-heaven | Ailanthus | altissima |
4 | alligatorweed | Alternanthera | philoxeroides |
5 | Palmer amaranth | Amaranthus | palmeri |
6 | redroot pigweed | Amaranthus | retroflexus |
7 | spiny amaranth | Amaranthus | spinosus |
8 | waterhemp | Amaranthus | tuberculatus |
9 | common ragweed | Ambrosia | artemisiifolia |
10 | giant ragweed | Ambrosia | trifida |
11 | purple ammannia | Ammannia | robusta |
12 | broomsedge | Andropogon | virginicus |
13 | jointhead arthraxon | Arthraxon | hispidus |
14 | trumpet creeper | Campsis | radicans |
15 | musk thistle | Carduus | nutans |
16 | southern sandbur | Cenchrus | echinatus |
17 | common lambsquarters | Chenopodium | album |
18 | bull thistle | Cirsium | vulgare |
19 | Benghal dayflower | Commelina | benghalensis |
20 | spreading dayflower | Commelina | diffusa |
21 | field bindweed | Convolvulus | arvensis |
22 | smellmelon | Cucumis | melo |
23 | bermudagrass | Cynodon | dactylon |
24 | horseweed | Erigeron | canadensis |
25 | spotted spurge | Euphorbia | maculata |
26 | showy crotalaria | Crotalaria | spectabilis |
27 | tropic croton | Croton | glandulosus var. septentrionalis |
28 | bermudagrass | Cynodon | dactylon |
29 | yellow nutsedge | Cyperus | esculentus |
30 | purple nutsedge | Cyperus | rotundus |
31 | rice flatsedge | Cyperus | iria |
32 | crowfootgrass | Dactyloctenium | aegyptium |
33 | jimsonweed | Datura | stramonium |
34 | Florida beggarweed | Desmodium | tortuosum |
35 | smooth crabgrass | Digitaria | ischaemum |
36 | large crabgrass | Digitaria | sanguinalis |
37 | Virginia buttonweed | Diodia | virginiana |
38 | Amazon sprangletop | Diplachne | panicoides |
39 | bearded sprangletop | Diplachne | fusca var. fascicularis |
40 | barnyardgrass | Echinochloa | crus-galli |
41 | eclipta | Eclipta | prostrata |
42 | autumn olive | Elaeagnus | umbellata |
43 | goosegrass | Eleusine | indica |
44 | southwestern cupgrass | Eriochloa | acuminata |
45 | wild poinsettia | Euphorbia | heterophylla |
46 | Carolina geranium | Geranium | carolinianum |
47 | ground ivy | Glechoma | hederacea |
48 | common sunflower | Helianthus | annuus |
49 | hydrilla | Hydrilla | verticillata |
50 | cogongrass | Imperata | cylindrica |
51 | red morningglory | Ipomoea | coccinea |
52 | ivyleaf morningglory | Ipomoea | hederacea |
53 | pitted morningglory | Ipomoea | lacunosa |
54 | bigroot morningglory | Ipomoea | pandurata |
55 | tall morningglory | Ipomoea | purpurea |
56 | palmleaf morningglory | Ipomoea | wrightii |
57 | smallflower morningglory | Jacquemontia | tamnifolia |
58 | false green kyllinga | Kyllinga | gracillima |
59 | henbit | Lamium | amplexicaule |
60 | tall fescue | Lolium | arundinaceum |
61 | Italian ryegrass | Lolium | perenne ssp. multiflorum |
62 | Japanese stiltgrass | Microstegium | vimineum |
63 | carpetweed | Mollugo | verticillata |
64 | cutleaf evening primrose | Oenothera | laciniata |
65 | red rice | Oryza | sativa |
66 | yellow woodsorrel | Oxalis | stricta |
67 | fall panicum | Panicum | dichotomiflorum |
68 | torpedo grass | Panicum | repens |
69 | dallisgrass | Paspalum | dilatatum |
70 | Pennsylvania smartweed | Persicaria | pensylvanica |
71 | ladysthumb | Persicaria | maculosa |
72 | cutleaf groundcherry | Physalis | angulata |
73 | clammy groundcherry | Physalis | heterophylla |
74 | buckhorn plantain | Plantago | lanceolata |
75 | annual bluegrass | Poa | annua |
76 | prostrate knotweed | Polygonum | aviculare |
77 | common purslane | Portulaca | oleracea |
78 | kudzu | Pueraria | montana |
79 | wild radish | Raphanus | raphanistrum |
80 | Florida pusley | Richardia | scabra |
81 | multiflora rose | Rosa | multiflora |
82 | curly dock | Rumex | crispus |
83 | sicklepod | Senna | obtusifolia |
84 | coffee senna | Senna | occidentalis |
85 | hemp sesbania | Sesbania | herbacea |
86 | giant foxtail | Setaria | faberi |
87 | yellow foxtail | Setaria | pumila |
88 | green foxtail | Setaria | viridis |
89 | arrowleaf sida | Sida | rhombifolia |
90 | prickly sida | Sida | spinosa |
91 | Carolina horsenettle | Solanum | carolinense |
92 | eastern black nightshade | Solanum | ptychanthum |
93 | lawn burweed | Soliva | sessilis |
94 | johnsongrass | Sorghum | halepense |
95 | common chickweed | Stellaria | media |
96 | dandelion | Taraxacum | officinale |
97 | puncturevine | Tribulus | terrestris |
98 | broadleaf signalgrass | Urochloa | platyphylla |
99 | Texas millet | Urochloa | texana |
100 | common cocklebur | Xanthium | strumarium |
Crops | Weeds | ||||||
1. | cotton | 6. | alfalfa | 1. | broadleaf signalgrass | 7. | Palmer amaranth |
2. | field corn | 7. | soybean | 2. | ivyleaf morningglory | 8. | pitted morningglory |
3. | grain sorghum | 8. | sunflower | 3. | fall panicum | 9. | prickly sida |
4. | pumpkin | 9. | wheat | 4. | hemp sesbania | 10. | seedling johnsongrass |
5. | rice | 10. | canola | 5. | large crabgrass | 11. | velvetleaf |
6. | yellow nutsedge | 12. | sicklepod |
Common name | Trade name | Herbicide family | Site of action (SOA) | Group # (SOA) | Application timing | Rate and adjuvant |
clethodim | Select Max | cyclohexanedione | ACCase inhibitor | 1 | POST | 0.091 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
pinoxaden | Axial XL | phenylpyrazoline | ACCase inhibitor | 1 | POST | 0.054 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
cloransulam | FirstRate | triazolopyrimidine | ALS inhibitor | 2 | PRE | 0.032 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
imazethapyr | Pursuit | imidazolinone | ALS inhibitor | 2 | PRE | 0.063 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
chlorimuron | Classic | sulfonylurea | ALS inhibitor | 2 | POST | 0.008 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
trifloxysulfuron | Envoke | sulfonylurea | ALS inhibitor | 2 | POST | 0.007 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
nicosulfuron | Accent Q | sulfonylurea | ALS inhibitor | 2 | POST | 0.031 lb ai/a + COC 1% |
pendimethalin | Prowl H2O | dinitroaniline | Microtubule assembly inhibitor | 3 | PRE | 1.43 lb ai/a |
2,4-D | 2,4-D LV4E | phenoxy-carboxylic-acid | Synthetic Auxin | 4 | POST | 0.5 lb ae/a |
dicamba | Clarity | benzoate | Synthetic Auxin | 4 | POST | 0.25 lb ae/a + NIS 0.25% |
quinclorac | Facet L | quinoline carboxylic acid | Synthetic Auxin | 4 | POST | 0.375 lb ae/a + MSO 1.5 pt/a |
atrazine | AAtrex 4L | triazine | Photosystem II Inhibitor | 5 | PRE | 2.0 lb ai/a |
metribuzin | Metribuzin 75DF | triazinone | Photosystem II inhibitor | 5 | PRE | 0.375 lb ai/a |
bentazon | Basagran 5L | benzothiadiazinone | Photosystem II inhibitor | 6 | POST | 1.0 lb ai/a + COC 1% |
bromoxynil | Buctril | nitrile | Photosystem II inhibitor | 6 | POST | 0.375 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
linuron | Linex 4L | urea | Photosystem II inhibitor | 5 | PRE | 0.75 lb ai/a |
fluometuron | Cotoran 4L | urea | Photosystem II inhibitor | 5 | PRE | 1.0 lb ai/a |
glyphosate | Roundup PowerMAX 3 | glycine | EPSP Synthase Inhibitor | 9 | POST | 1.13 lb ae/a + AMS 8.5 lb/100 gal |
glufosinate | Liberty 280SL | phosphinic acid | Glutamine Synthetase Inhibitor | 10 | POST | 0.402 lb ai/a + AMS 3 lb/A |
clomazone | Command 3ME | isoxazolidinone | DOXP synthase inhibitor | 13 | PRE | 0.56 lb ai/a |
flumioxazin | Valor EZ | N-phenyl imide | PPO inhibitor | 14 | PRE | 0.078 lb ai/a |
fomesafen | Reflex | diphenyl ether | PPO inhibitor | 14 | POST | 0.25 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
saflufenacil | Sharpen | N-phenyl imide | PPO inhibitor | 14 | POST | 0.022 lb ai/a + MSO 1% + AMS 8.5 lb/100gal |
pyroxasulfone | Zidua SC | isoxazoline | Very long-chain fatty acid synthesis inhibitor | 15 | PRE | 0.098 lb ai/a |
S-metolachlor | Dual II Magnum | α-chloroacetamide | Very long-chain fatty acid synthesis inhibitor | 15 | PRE | 1.27 lb ai/a |
paraquat | Gramoxone | pyridinium | Photosystem I electron diverter | 22 | POST | 0.5 lb ai/a + NIS 0.25% |
mesotrione | Callisto | triketone | HPPD inhibitor | 27 | PRE | 0.094 lb ai/a + COC 1% |
topramezone | Impact | pyrazole | HPPD inhibitor | 27 | PRE | 0.022 lb ai/a + MSO 0.5% |
Potential Crops (6):
Cotton, field corn, grain sorghum, soybean, tall fescue (forage and turf), non-crop (rights-of-way, etc.)
Weeds:
Any weed from the weed identification list above.
Herbicides:
Any herbicide labeled in the crops listed above.
Scoring:
The ‘farmer’ and a judge will independently score each contestant from predetermined scoring sheet.
Role:
Each contestant will be assuming the role of a chemical company representative, independent crop consultant, or state extension specialist.